You're The Voice | by Efrat Fenigson
You Think You’re Sovereign Until You Go Out To The Real World | Ep. 132
By Efrat Fenigson
Aired Apr 15, 2026 · 49m · Last boosted 28d ago
Chapters
Show Notes
Today I’m sharing something different: I was interviewed by Mike Peterson on the Bitcoin Beach podcast while I was in El Salvador in Nov. 2025. Mike wrote: “What if the real trap is not working hard, but spending your best years building someone else’s empire earning money you do not even trust? Mike Peterson sat down with Efrat during “Bitcoin Historico” for a direct conversation about the fiat system, corporate life, and why “growth for growth’s sake” eventually stops making sense. She explains how years of being great at driving revenue for other people pushed me tow...
Nostr Boost Stats
- sats
- 770
- boosts
- 2
- boosters
- 2
- sats
- 0
- boosts
- 0
- boosters
- 0
- sats
- 350
- boost
- 1
- booster
- 1
- sats
- 770
- boosts
- 2
- boosters
- 2
Nostr Community
Everyone who has boosted You Think You’re Sovereign Until You Go Out To The Real World | Ep. 132 on Nostr, ranked by sats sent, all time.
-
ndeet
420 sats
- user13811801 350 sats
Other Episodes This Community Boosts Other shows' episodes boosted by people who boosted this episode
Nov 25, 2025
Nostr Boosts:1.3k
Nostr Boosts:1.3k
ndeetOct 2, 2025
420 There is a big difference if you signal shitcoins are welcome or you focus on money and discourage non-monetary use cases. There are plenty of shitcoins they can play on.
Nodes and users are important otherwise it deceases to be Bitcoin and becomes captured and centralized.
ndeetOct 2, 2025
420 What bs are you talking abou Rizzo, lol.
ndeetOct 2, 2025
420 I have never heard that knots supporters argue that they don't believe that a fee market establishes in the future. Hmm, why you think Luke is for 300kb blocks 🤔
Nostr Boosts:1.3k
ndeetMar 9, 2025
420 Andere Kritikpunkte stimme ich zu.
ndeetMar 9, 2025
420 Super Argument Dennis. Tom blendet Kernproblematik aufgrund von Indizien-DoS ab und kommt zu falschen Rückschlüssen. Ganz ohne technisches Verständnis kann man halt leider keine Rückschlüsse auf Validität der Indizien und Schutz vor Zentralisierung ziehen, sorry Tom.
ndeetMar 9, 2025
420 Genau andersrum, Ver und Co waren die großen Player (Exchanges, Miner, ..) die ihre Geschäftsmodelle schützen wollten und via Blockgröße einfachste Lösung durchdrücken wollten (Zentralisierung). Mining Pools würden mit Bigblocks noch mehr zentralisiert sein weil schwerer Nodes zu betreiben. Pools ist ein Problem, Lösung Stratum v2, Ocean/Datum um Blocktemplates zu dezentralisieren. Ver/Bigblocks hätte nichts daran geändert bzw. verschlimmert. Blocksizewar als neutralere Quelle lesen.
Nostr Boosts:1.3k
Mar 12, 2026
Nostr Boosts:
May 11, 2026
Nostr Boosts:840
Mar 23, 2026
Nostr Boosts:840
Jan 10, 2026
Nostr Boosts:840
ndeetJan 19, 2026
420 Great content from @npub1klkk3vrzm…, thanks for reading. 🤙
ndeetJan 19, 2026
420 Nostr Boosts:840
Oct 31, 2025
Jun 9, 2025
Nostr Boosts:840
May 29, 2025
Nostr Boosts:840
May 16, 2025
Nostr Boosts:840
ndeetMay 6, 2025
420 Puh, wenig Insights in die Problematik. Die op_return filter datacarrier und datacarriersize sollen auch entfernt werden, also nicht mehr konfigurierbar. op_return kostet 4x fees daher wird weiter über witness gespamt werden, und noch paar andere Punkte die das Ganze kontrovers machen.
ndeetMay 6, 2025
420 
Apr 17, 2025
Nostr Boosts:840
Nostr Boosts:840
Sep 8, 2026
Nostr Boosts:
user13811801Sep 11, 2026
999 
Sep 1, 2026
Nostr Boosts:
Jun 4, 2026
Nostr Boosts:
user13811801Aug 28, 2026
750 
Nostr Boosts:
user13811801Sep 16, 2026
600 
Nostr Boosts:
user13811801Sep 7, 2026
500 
Nostr Boosts:
user13811801Sep 2, 2026
500 
Nostr Boosts:
user13811801Aug 23, 2026
500 Nostr Boosts:
user13811801Aug 19, 2026
500 
Mar 31, 2026
Nostr Boosts:
user13811801Aug 19, 2026
500 
Jul 30, 2026
Nostr Boosts:
user13811801Aug 15, 2026
500 
Nostr Boosts:
user13811801Sep 10, 2026
450 Nostr Boosts:420
ndeetSep 21, 2026
420 Episode Boosts
Every boost sent to this episode, as published to Nostr, newest first.
