All Episodes

The Bitcoin Infinity Show

BIP-110 and the Fight for Bitcoin's Future with Hodlonaut | Bitcoin Infinity Show #191

By Knut Svanholm and Luke de Wolf

Aired Feb 23, 2026 · 1h 53m · Last boosted Mar 30, 2026

View Show
Show Notes

Hodlonaut joins the Bitcoin Infinity Show to talk about his controversial decision to first support and then withdraw support for BIP-110, the proposed soft fork targeting spam and data abuse on Bitcoin. The conversation covers Bitcoin Core's uncapping of OP_RETURN, the "wokification" of Core development, lessons from the block size wars, and whether BIP-110 is the right hill for plebs to die on in defending Bitcoin as money. Knut and Hodlonaut go through BIP 110's specific restrictions point by point while debating governance, urgency, and the principled case for keeping Bitcoin simple and resistant to change. ...

Nostr Boost Stats

sats
8.6k
boosts
7
boosters
6

Nostr Community

Everyone who has boosted BIP-110 and the Fight for Bitcoin's Future with Hodlonaut | Bitcoin Infinity Show #191 on Nostr, ranked by sats sent, all time.

  1. Garth 5k sats
  2. Justis 1k sats
  3. daann 1k sats
  4. jgbtc 1k sats
  5. ₿jarni ⚡iggi 500 sats
  1. Mischa 100 sats
Other Episodes This Community Boosts Other shows' episodes boosted by people who boosted this episode
Nostr Boosts:30k
MischaJan 11, 2026
30k
Strong interview with very interesting points.The fact that financial service providers must always chase higher returns just to keep capital, otherwise it moves to competitors, makes you question whether this system has any real winners. In the end, it feels like there are only two options: no money at all, or money based on debt and controlled through debt. Bitcoin finally offers a way out of this. Thank you, Peter. It’s clear that you truly want to make things better and that you are actively working toward change.
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:30k
MischaJan 11, 2026
30k
Strong interview with very interesting points.The fact that financial service providers must always chase higher returns just to keep capital, otherwise it moves to competitors, makes you question whether this system has any real winners. In the end, it feels like there are only two options: no money at all, or money based on debt and controlled through debt. Bitcoin finally offers a way out of this. Thank you, Peter. It’s clear that you truly want to make things better and that you are actively working toward change.
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:10k
jgbtcNov 27, 2025
5k
Great episode, thanks! Core's main argument (repeated ad nauseum) is filters don't work 100% of the time. It doesn't need to be perfect, it needs to be as good as possible. Maximum friction for spammers and anyone else who wants to use Bitcoin for non-monetary uses. Of course miners will do anything for money, that's exactly why an op_return limit and other policies are needed, but certain core devs have twisted this around to justify removing one of the few tools available to pleb node operators (the absurdly high v30 default is effectively the same as removal). The point Luke makes at 1:36:40 is particularly good. Core supporters focus on one side of the equation, the spam that gets mined, and ignore what isn't. The thing about deterrents is we can't know how many attacks aren't even attempted at all because a deterrent exists. In the firewall example, at least intrusion attempts can be detected, but the attacks that never happen can't be measured and so are easy to ignore and dismiss. This is one of many flaws in Core's arguments. Thanks again guys!
MischaNov 26, 2025
5k
A great podcast. If you want to understand the Core vs. Knots topic, this is a must-listen.
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:20k
MischaDec 26, 2025
20k
Excellent episode. Very informative and well spent two hours. Thank you.
See all boosts
Sep 9, 2024
Nostr Boosts:20k
garthSep 12, 2024
20k
It’s rare these days that I’m shocked, but this blew my socks off multiple times! Not sure what to make of it but let’s have some more please 🙏
See all boosts
Jul 13, 2026
Nostr Boosts:10k
jgbtcJul 14, 2026
10k
Awesome episode!
See all boosts
May 27, 2026
Nostr Boosts:10k
jgbtcMay 29, 2026
10k
I quit drinking years ago, over a decade, and the thing that helped the most was to think of my desire to drink as this little person inside me, and me beating the shit out of him every time he tried to talk me into cheating. I can say from this experience that everything you said about appetite in this episode was spot on and high signal. I appreciate it.
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:10k
garthOct 14, 2025
10k
This was great, something I’ve been coming to terms with recently is I don’t think it’s (BTC adoption) going to happen as quickly as I expect it should or wish it would.
See all boosts
Aug 22, 2025
Nostr Boosts:10k
garthAug 23, 2025
10k
@npub1hk0tv47zt… is so unhinged, love it!
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:10k
garthAug 5, 2025
10k
@npub1unmftuzmk… I was just gloating to my wife about ad-free subscription podcasts on @npub1v5ufyh4lk…. She was very envious. There is widespread appeal for this.
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:10k
garthJul 9, 2025
10k
@npub1s5yq6wadw… is BTC Fundamentals going to embrace the @npub1v5ufyh4lk… ad-free subscription model? I love your show and really hate ads 😉
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:10k
garthJul 2, 2025
10k
I fucking love ad-free subscription option. Sorry @npub1guh5grefa… but I don’t miss your Fold card as reads 😉
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:10k
garthFeb 8, 2025
10k
Not listened yet but fired up for some flagrant Luongo
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:10k
garthJan 8, 2025
10k
@npub1unmftuzmk… there are still serious issues with @npub1v5ufyh4lk… I just lost this episode mid listen and history for the show going back to September. Only recovered this episode due to activity history.
See all boosts
Nov 26, 2024
Nostr Boosts:10k
bjarniDec 3, 2024
10k
Skemmtilegt viðtal við Halldór og hvernig hann upplifir það mögulega frelsi sem Bitcoin getur veitt honum sem höfund og útgefanda á sinni bók, þrátt fyrir að vera ekki beint djúpt sokkinn inní Bitcoin kanínu holuna. Hefði allveg áhuga á að skoða þetta Mikilvæga Rusl 😉 Óransj Kveðja 🧡
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:10k
garthDec 3, 2024
10k
This was great, havent had a Bitcoin pod get me frothy in a while 🙏
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:10k
garthOct 26, 2024
10k
This is wild, still nor sure what to make of it all, but awesome series, thanks Princey 🙏
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:10k
garthOct 17, 2024
10k
Started episode 5 of this series and had to pause to go start from the beginning
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:10k
garthAug 13, 2024
10k
Really enjoyed this, good guest especially considering it was his first rodeo, yeehaaw
See all boosts
Aug 6, 2024
Nostr Boosts:10k
garthAug 6, 2024
10k
Actually enjoyed this but it was hard work. Am a little unclear about how we fix the world though? Move to the wilderness with a Starlink satellite, build online social capital, and hope the PayPal Mafia take down some roadblocks? I don’t understand how PayPal Mafia reconciles with decentralisation? What am I missing here?
See all boosts
Aug 25, 2024
Nostr Boosts:5.2k
bjarniAug 26, 2024
5.2k
Ef maður var ekki nægilega bullish fyrir þeim möguleikum sem Nostr+Bitcoin búa yfir, þá ætti maður að vera það núna! Takk fyrir mig.
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:5k
jgbtcDec 8, 2025
5k
"distributed authoritarianiam" Wow, what a 🚩by Greg Maxwell, who is perfectly fine with centralized authoritarianism by Core. Such a fundamental misunderstanding of the issue, and what it means to run your own node, is a serious problem considering who it's coming from. Turns out "the experts" aren't the experts we thought they were. The way core proponents twist the meaning of censorship and authoritarianism is alarming. Another great discussion. Thanks guys!
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:5k
jgbtcNov 21, 2025
5k
The best example of core going woke was the blackist change in 2020. It's a particularly good example because the PR author explicitly did it for woke reasons: to use a "more appropriate" word and "make everyone happy". Contrary to Murch's claim that core tries to keep conversations technical (around 1:39:00), this PR had no technical justification at all. This was a good conversation, but if anything it made me even more anti-core. A lot of nitpicky weak arguments from Murch, and dismissive hand waving of valid concerns. We know there is more than one core dev, we have read the core arguments and we are still unconvinced. For all Murch's appeals for understanding the core position (I did make it to the end) he seems to have made very little effort to understand the position against this change. I read the "experts" letter, did he read the rebuttals? https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/19227
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:5k
jgbtcOct 22, 2025
5k
Great episode.
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:5k
garthOct 15, 2025
5k
Great rip
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:5k
garthSep 16, 2025
5k
@npub1wes30pmnspcxgxwdtz2zvehpg3cm0rjseemfekzmr5mmffkw583qm48688 this is worth a listen, I know you have the time 😉
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:5k
jgbtcSep 10, 2025
5k
Great episode!
See all boosts
Jun 24, 2025
Nostr Boosts:5k
garthJun 25, 2025
5k
I saw What’s the Problem a few months ago, it’s great, love the origin story 🙏
See all boosts
May 12, 2025
Nostr Boosts:5k
jgbtcMay 13, 2025
5k
Another awesome episode. Thanks Guy!
See all boosts
Nostr Boosts:5k
jgbtcMay 6, 2025
5k
Awesome discussion. Mechanic's summary at the start was more convincing than anything I've heard in favor of this retarded change. The beginning of the core woke infestation was the PR to remove the word "blacklist" from some test code because, somehow, this word is offensive. All the devs cried "it's no big deal" but I knew at the time it was a bad sign. Now core is a woke cesspool. I will not be running their software anymore.
See all boosts

Episode Boosts

Every boost sent to this episode, as published to Nostr, newest first.

  • 5,000 via Fountain
    This was some grade A pleb slop 🙏
  • 500 via Fountain
    Great listening. Interesting that Pussies, Dicks and Ass-Holes theory 😆
  • 1,000 via Fountain
    Thanks to both gents. I am kind of envious of Hodlnaut’s absence/ignorance on all this. I am very happy he is back now.
  • 500 via Fountain
    Brilliant explanation of the classic pussy, dick and asshole trilema!
  • 500 via Fountain
  • 100 via Fountain
    Thanks for the podcast. I agree with almost everything. One more specific point I would add: every additional development on Bitcoin increases complexity and with it the risk of errors. Each new layer makes us more dependent on developers, on how they interpret the code, and how they assess trade-offs. The more complex the system becomes, the harder it is for the network as a whole to evaluate changes and make sound decisions. At the same time, the attack surface grows, both technically and socially. Greater dependency also increases the risk of capture or undue influence. In that sense, a simple and clearly defined protocol is not stagnation. It is protection.
  • 1,000 via Fountain
    Great conversation. I'm a believer in "strong opinions loosely held'. There's nothing wrong with reassessment and changing your mind at any time, although it doesn't seem like there's any major disagreement with hodlonaut's views and those of BIP-110 supporters. Regardless, I respect his choice to withdraw support. Taking a non-committal view while assessing is always wise. An episode with Giacomo on the topic next would be awesome.