Laskeeze

Loved hearing Lyn talking about some of the risks with MSTR and what she thinks about the mnav. Toward the end I felt like she had to explain basic economics to this guy when talking about stablecoins. He was basically saying if I go to the grocery store and buy eggs there's no new demand for eggs because the grocery store already owned them

Great podcast, thanks Danny. One aspect of AI risk I still don't understand: if AI becomes extremely intelligent in a variety of ways (AI-->AGI-->super intelligence), why does it follow that it would ever come up with its own goals that weren't given to it by humans? Why would an AI that's good at every board game (more general) be more likely to come up with its own goals than an AI that's just good at chess (more narrow)? Could be something I'm missing but I don't see how becoming more generalized makes AI more likely to have its own agency.

Thank you. I upgraded to core 30. To think that consensus transactions are worse than a soft fork is antithetical to bitcoin. I may not love nfts/ordinals but I also don't like terrorist orgs using bitcoin, but the whole point is it's not up to me what transaction is "spam" or worthy of being censored. Money for enemies including nfters!!!! Also, if we're going to soft fork it should be for a real threat (quantum, the time bug we inevitably have to fork for) not for "spam"